AOL has prepared some resources if you’d like to make your local representative (or the federal Minister for Agriculture) aware of the impact that abandoning mandatory domestic regulation will have on your business.
You can click the buttons below for a full letter that’s ready for distribution, or else some general dot points that may inform your letter.
Australia is misaligned with global standards and is officially the last developed nation in the world to not have an enforced domestic standard for the use of the word “organic”.
It is Australian Organic Limited’s strategic priority to work with government and key regulatory bodies to deliver a fit for purpose regulatory process that is consistent with the organic export requirements.
This consistent approach to the organic industry will ensure Australia’s world-class organic standard will continue to grow market access internationally and provide Australian consumers with confidence when choosing products that claim to be organic.
Australian Organic Limited believes legislation is the best way forward for consistent domestic regulation of the Australian Organic Industry. The statement of support gives people in the Organic Industry, whether they are operators, consumers or other stakeholders, the opportunity to show their support for the legislative option without having to prepare a submission for the Regulatory Impact Statement process that commenced in early 2022.
View AOL’s Statement of Support here
PricewaterhouseCoopers Australia (PwC) has developed a survey for operators within the domestic organics market to establish a complete picture of the current market and into the foreseeable future. A separate survey was also developed for consumers, to inform the benefits and costs captured as part of an economic analysis of regulatory options proposed for the organics market Both surveys have now closed.
The Department of Agriculture continues to finalise its report based on the findings of the consultation regulatory impact statement process. The Department received over 80 submissions.
Based on feedback we have received from the Department, it appears the submissions indicate a preference for a new regulatory framework. While we await the details of what this framework will look like in the Department’s report, the support for regulation is the first step to the creation of a domestic standard for the organic industry.
The announcement of a federal election in April 2022 brought about a pause in the domestic regulation process, with Labor going on to claim government and the new Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry taking shape. Much of their focus following the election was on pressing matters related to flooding and biosecurity, but the industry managed to re-engage the organic discussion with the Department and new Minister for Agriculture Murray Watt later in 2022. The Department has expressed support for implementation of a domestic standard, but it will take some time for the finer points of proposed legislation to be explicated. AOL will continue to provide updates whenever possible.
The Domestic Regulation Information Pack prepared by AOL is still relevant for any members who wish to contact their local member of parliament and raise the issue of the domestic regulation directly. AOL encourages everyone to email this pack directly to their local member, or else hand the pack over directly at any events where they are set to appear.
Please click here to access the pack.
In December 2020, Minister Littleproud announced the Organics Industry Advisory Group (OIAG) bringing together sixteen organic industry representatives; from producers to manufacturers, consumers to small growers, certification and industry bodies; to assess whether the current framework was fit for purpose and recommend what consistent domestic regulation should look like.
After discussions between January and June 2021, the OIAG agreed the current regulatory framework was not fit for purpose and made clear recommendations to Minister Littleproud in a report on how the organic industry can reach its full potential delivered in June 2021.
On 26 November 2021, the Minister announced a Regulatory Impact Statement (RIS) as part of the next stage of reviewing and progressing the implementation of domestic regulation in Australia. AOL continued to work with the Government during this RIS process as part of the reconvened OIAG and provided advice to the Department of Agriculture and consultants from PriceWaterhouseCoopers on how to connect with industry stakeholders as part of the RIS.
Following the Minister’s announcement The Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment conducted surveys with businesses, consumers and roundtables (which AOL participated in) throughout January 2022. When these surveys were complete the Department announced a consultation RIS which ran from 18 February to 17 March 2022. AOL provided a comprehensive submission on behalf of its members highlighting the need for domestic legislation of the National Standard.
As a member of the Organic Industry Advisory Committee, AOL and many of its members (Arcadian, Kialla, Angove Wines, The Organic Milk Co, Mallee Organics, ACO Certification, AUS-QUAL, Cullen Wines, Pure Harvest), have been working closely with Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment to ensure the interests of the industry are represented through consistent measured and future-focused outcomes.
At present, the only way an Australian consumer can be certain a product is truly organic is to look for a certification mark. There are currently six marks used within Australia, each mark is attached to a certification body approved by the Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry (DAFF) to the National Standard for Organic & Bio Dynamic Produce (National Standard or NS) under the Export Control Act (2020).
The National Standard, via the use of an Organic Goods Certificate (OGC), provides 81 countries with surety that the produce they are purchasing from Australia adheres to the rigorous certification and audit processes. This provides surety for the buyers in those markets that the produce adheres to the rigorous certification and audit processes as set out in the National Standard. However, within Australia there are variations of Standards that make the consumption and production of organic products difficult to navigate and results in confusion for consumers.
The National Standard was written with the intention to be enforced domestically as clearly stated by Mr Crean in a Ministerial Press Release, dated 10 February 1992 when the National Standard for Organic & Bio Dynamic Produce was released; “I therefore intend to request the new National Food Authority to take the necessary action to ensure the regulatory controls on the domestic market parallel those which I am implementing for export.”
The Standard was and remains world-class as stated by Mr Crean; “This is a hallmark achievement for the Australian organic produce industry which I understand has produced the first nationally agreed standard outside of the European Community.”
Australian Organic Limited is proposing that the National Standard be enforced domestically to provide confidence and a level playing field in a dynamic growth industry.
The Australian Organic industry contributes over $2 billion annually to the national economy and is growing year on year.
The 2021 Australian Organic Market Report shows that Australian shoppers are purchasing more organic products than ever before:
*Reeves, M. (2020), IBISWorld Organic Farming in Australia.
Despite significant growth, Australian consumers are still confused or fooled at the register on a regular basis due to multiple standards and the prolific growth of products simply claiming to be organic. While the ACCC is tasked with managing consumer deception, its limited resources are not keeping up with the fast-growing sector requirements and the opportunists that are watering down the organic standard.
The 2021 Australian Organic Market Report revealed that almost 9 in 10 shoppers did not know there was a single legal definition for the term organic in Australia. Worryingly, 31% of shoppers who purchased an organic product in the past year believe they have been previously misled by organic claims on product packaging.
In June 2020, Australian Organic Limited submitted, on behalf of its members, a discussion paper outlining the opportunities for future economic and industry growth should a mandatory domestic standard be implemented. Providing consistency in both markets will allow discussion of equivalency to progress with confidence as international stakeholders have provided comments that this discrepancy limits trust in our exports.
We continue to support the co-regulatory model for the maintenance of the standard and certification program that underpins the organic industry.
“One of the biggest impediments to the export of Certified Organic product from Australia is our lack of equivalency with chief markets, with a significant obstacle to us achieving equivalency being our lack of organic domestic legislation.
To enable us to achieve our primary objective, we must first achieve implementing a domestic standard. We hope to effect this change by having the National Organic Standard introduced into the legislative framework.
AOL is working with Government and Industry to provide a pathway for the implementation of a consistent domestic standard. It is worth noting that the single biggest competitor to organic products domestically is “fake organic”. A mandatory domestic standard will not only significantly increase exports for Australian Organic businesses, it will also remove the biggest competitor in their local market.”
Martin Meek
Former Chairman, Australian Organic Limited
Please enter a search term below and we will do our best to help you find the information you are after.